jwithrow, Author at The Phoenician League

Building a System for Consistent Wealth

We’re talking about consistent wealth this week. And as we noted, the simplest way to build consistent wealth is to buy quality assets on a regular schedule. Like clockwork.

When we left off yesterday, I promised to share with you how to create a system for this… and exactly which investments to make right now. That will be our topic for today.

I’ll start by acknowledging that everybody’s situation is different. Anything I suggest in these pages should be taken as just that – a broad suggestion. Nothing here should be considered personalized financial advice.

That said, most of us earn income on a regular schedule. The easiest way to create a system for consistent wealth is to set aside a chunk of our income for investing the moment we receive it.

This is the old pay yourself first principle. Invest a portion of your income as soon as you receive it – before you pay any bills or make any purchases.

To make this sustainable, the portion we invest has to be reasonable. It should be an amount that won’t leave us scrimping for quarters under the couch cushions at the end of the month.

At the same time, it should be a material amount. Investing five dollars every two weeks isn’t going to do much for us.

Once we have settled on our investing budget, we should spread it out evenly over several different assets. And we do this first thing every time we get paid – no matter what.

So that leaves the question: what assets should we invest in each pay period?

Consistent Wealth

Last week we talked about how consistency is the key to success.

Success usually doesn’t come from one massive accomplishment. Rather, it comes from many small accomplishments made day after day after day.

All the little accomplishments accrete. That is, they build upon one another. Then one day you wake up and realize they have compounded into something truly impressive.

The same principle applies to investing. It’s a simple thing – but I don’t think this is well understood today.

When I was a young professional, I thought investing was about hitting it big. So I was obsessed with trying to time the stock market. And I primarily invested in the riskiest stocks I could. When I found one with a good story, I would put a big chunk of my investable money into it.

Then I would start counting my gains prematurely. I would think to myself – if it doubles, I’ll turn my $10,000 into $20,000. If it triples, I’ll have $30,000. But what if it’s a ten-bagger? Then I’ll have $100,000!

Of course, it never worked out as well as I had mapped out in my head. Because that approach isn’t investing… it’s speculating.

An investor doesn’t think in terms of hitting it big. He (or she) thinks in terms of compounding money over long periods of time. That’s Einstein’s secret to wealth.

On History and Money – Lessons from the Allegheny Frontier

We took the kids on a field trip to the historic Homestead resort over the weekend. Here’s the view as we approached the grounds:

The Homestead rests in Hot Springs, Virginia. It’s located way up in the Allegheny mountains. The resort’s doors first opened in 1766 – back before the founding of America.

For early Americans, this was the western frontier. What lie west of the ancient Appalachian mountain range was a mystery.

The Homestead’s primary draw at the time was the surrounding hot springs for which the town was named. People believed the natural springs had healing properties. And more than a few traveled to the Homestead for a chance to bathe in them.

Thomas Jefferson was one of them.

Jefferson traveled to the Homestead in 1818. He was 75 years old and suffering from rheumatism at the time.

It’s documented that Jefferson spent three weeks at the Homestead. And he took to the hot springs three times a day to gain reprieve from his illness.

I imagine he spent considerable time browsing the resort’s eclectic library as well. Here it is:

My Phone’s New Superpower

Start off your morning by doing that day’s most important task. And do this every single day – no exceptions.

It’s the WIN principle. What’s Important Now.

I pulled that acronym from retired college football coach Bud Foster. Bud was the Defensive Coordinator for Virginia Tech’s football program for decades. He had his players walk around carrying a beat up old lunch pail with the WIN moniker painted on it.

Bud coached in the 2000 national championship game against legendary Bobby Bowden’s Florida State program. The third quarter of that game ended with Virginia Tech up one point on vaunted Florida State. That’s how close Bud and his philosophy came to the pinnacle of the sport—though Florida State came back to win in the final quarter.

The power of this principle is in consistency.

If you do the most important thing you have to do first thing every morning, every day – that productivity will compound. Over time all those little things will add up to big things.

Darren Hardy spelled out how this works in his book The Compound Effect. It’s a timeless secret of success in any endeavor.

For years I believed the secret of this formula lie in doing your most important task first thing in the morning. But recently I’ve realized that’s not it.

Notes from off the Digital Grid

I went off the digital grid last week.

As I mentioned earlier this month, I’ve been exploring alternative smart phone operating systems recently. But up to this point I’ve conducted my research using a spare phone running on Wi-Fi. I kept my iPhone as my primary device.

Until last week. I ditched the iPhone and went all in GrapheneOS. Now I’m fully off the digital grid.

The transition process was a tad inconvenient. Like all Apple products, the iPhone is elegant, yet easy to use. The iOS interface becomes second nature very quickly.

But now that I’m fully acclimated to Graphene, my only regret is not taking the plunge sooner.

As a reminder, 99% of the world’s smart phones run either Apple iOS or Google’s Android. And those systems send data back to Apple and Google every four and a half minutes on average.

In other words, the operating systems report back to headquarters with information about what we’re doing on our phone. There’s no way to stop this.

Meanwhile, neither Apple’s App Store nor the Google Play marketplace provide transparency around an app’s tracking capabilities. And they require us to give each application we download a host of permissions.

GrapheneOS flips the script.

First, it provides access to several open source app stores. Each gives us a report on every app’s tracking abilities.

It probably comes as no surprise that every app I had on my iPhone came with third-party trackers attached. That means every app I had was sending data on me back to various third-party companies. And who knows what they were doing with my data from there.

Some apps only had one or two trackers attached to them. Others were even more egregious. For example, the Weather Channel app came packaged with 14 different trackers. Have a look:

Bank reserves and the future…

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell spoke to the House Financial Services Committee last week.

Later in the discussions, the Basel III endgame proposal came up. The proposal pertains to bank reserve requirements for both lending and trading activities.

Interest rates get all the attention when it comes to the Federal Reserve’s (the Fed’s) monetary policy. But bank reserve requirements are just as important.

Bank reserves are simply the money that banks keep on hand to back any loans or investments they make. Greater reserves equate to less risk.

Central banks set reserve requirements as a percentage of a bank’s deposits. There are some nuances to this calculation, but since 1982 the base reserve requirement has been 10% for banks here in the United States.

That means US banks have been free to lend or invest $90 for every $100 they receive in customer deposits. They must hold the other 10% in reserves.

We call this a fractional reserve system. Because the bank’s only need to hold a fraction of their customers’ deposits in reserve.

But that changed on March 26, 2020.

Interest Rate Signals and a Fork in the Path

We’re talking macroeconomics this week – with a focus on the Federal Reserve (the Fed).

Yesterday I put forth the idea that Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is making monetary policy decisions with fiscal responsibility in mind. This is just a theory… and probably not a popular one.

But thus far the theory has held.

Powell clearly recognizes the need for normalized interest rates. He’s been as direct about this as a Fed Chair can be.

The fact is, an economy cannot survive on a permanent diet of cheap money and the malinvestment it fuels. We need real interest rates to help us make informed calculations about which projects we undertake and which we don’t.

This is how the market economy allocates resources effectively – as Adam Smith pointed out in his The Wealth of Nations.

Smith observed that firms and investors make decisions based on their own profits. Yet an invisible hand seems to promote efficient economic growth from their independent actions.

On Jerome Powell, rate cuts, and a show worth watching…

“The danger of moving too soon is that the job’s not quite done”, Federal Reserve (Fed) Chairman Jerome Powell told 60-Minutes last month. He then advised that the Fed would not cut interest rates in March.

Powell followed that up with testimony before Congress last week. He reiterated his position that it’s too soon to talk about cutting rates… and he refused to commit to a timetable for doing so.

This matches up with what I suggested in these pages back in December – the market’s expectations of aggressive rate cuts in 2024 were misguided.

It all stemmed from a misunderstanding around the Federal Open Market Committee’s (FOMC’s) Q4 2023 “dot plot” – which showed that FOMC members projected three rate cuts this year with the first in March.

The FOMC is composed of 12 members. It includes the Fed Chair, the Board of Governors, President of the New York Fed, and four of the other regional Fed presidents.

The FOMC is technically the Fed’s inner sanctum. It meets eight times a year to discuss monetary policy.

And the dot plot is a chart that summarizes the FOMC’s collective expectations for interest rates over time. The market sees it as representative of the Fed’s insider discussions. But that’s not necessarily the case…

True Financial Security

We’re talking rugged independence and personal sovereignty this week. And when we left off yesterday, we talked about what not to do if we want to maintain full control over our money and investments.

Today we’re going to talk about a better approach. And it starts with this – the entire idea of “retirement planning” is flawed.

As we discussed yesterday, the traditional retirement planning model is all about keeping us locked into investment accounts (401(k)s/IRAs) in which we provide all the money and take all the risks – yet we have no control.

Even worse, these accounts force a range of arbitrary requirements and restrictions upon us… and the rules could change at any time. We have no input whatsoever. Yet, we will be penalized if we do not comply with the rules as they are written.

Why would we agree to such a one-sided arrangement? And for that matter – what’s the goal here?

A basic rule of success in any endeavor is to figure out exactly what outcome you want before committing to any course of action. “Begin with the end in mind”, as famed author Stephen Covey put it.

It’s all about clarity of purpose. Once we have it, we simply need to do the things that will bring our desired end to fruition.

With that principle established I have to ask – what do most people who follow the traditional retirement planning model really want?

On financial sovereignty and investment partnerships…

We’re talking rugged independence this week – thus far with an eye on reclaiming digital sovereignty. Today let’s add money and finance to the picture.

As we discussed last month, most of us have been encouraged to go about personal finance the same way.

We’re told to save for retirement by funneling our money into qualified retirement accounts. Then we can choose our investments from a range of various kinds of funds.

Modern retirement planning has its roots in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) of 1974. That legislation created the Individual Retirement Account (IRA). Then supplemental legislation created the 401(k) and the SEP IRA for self-employed individuals in 1978.

This thrust millions of people into the stock market for the very first time. And seeing this for the opportunity it was, Wall Street built an entire industry around herding money into cookie-cutter investment funds. Retirement, Inc. was born.

Fast forward to today and there are over 15,000 different investment funds out there to choose from. And every single one of these funds comes with its own fee structure. These fees ensure that the fund managers get paid no matter how their investments perform.

The problem is, this approach is riddled with weaknesses. And it requires us to give up nearly all control over our money. In several ways…